In the case of Major Gen. Darshan Singh v/s Brij Bhushan Chaudhary; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9360 OF 2013, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment highlighting the importance of truthfulness and equity in seeking specific performance of a contract. The case revolved around an agreement for the sale of a plot of land in Chandigarh, where the plaintiffs sought specific performance of the contract.
The plaintiffs claimed that the defendant had failed to fulfil the terms of the agreement, leading them to file a suit for specific performance or damages. However, during the course of the legal proceedings, it was revealed that the plaintiffs had made false statements in their pleadings, including misrepresenting the nature of the property and their readiness to perform their part of the agreement.
The Apex Court, in its judgment, emphasized the discretionary nature of granting specific performance as an equitable remedy. The Court noted that a person seeking equity must act equitably themselves. In this case, the plaintiffs’ conduct of making false statements and withholding crucial information from the court weighed against their plea for specific performance.
Despite the plaintiffs’ arguments and appeals, the Court held that due to their lack of honesty and transparency in the proceedings, they were not entitled to the discretionary relief of specific performance. The Court underscored the principle that the relief of specific performance is not an automatic entitlement but is subject to the equitable considerations of the case, including the conduct of the parties involved.
This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of truthfulness and integrity in legal proceedings, especially when seeking equitable remedies like specific performance. It reinforces the notion that the courts will scrutinize the conduct of the parties and may deny relief if there is a lack of honesty or fairness in their actions. The case sets a precedent for upholding the principles of equity and fairness in contractual disputes, emphasizing the need for transparency and integrity in seeking legal remedies.

Author of this article:
Adv. Ravish Bhatt,
Partner, R&D Law Chambers,
Dual Qualified Lawyer Solicitor | International Tax Affiliate

Connect with Mr. Bhatt on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adit-ravishbhatt/

  • Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader or user should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information written above without first seeking legal advice from qualified law practitioner.
SideMenu