Services Offered For Businesses in India

Insolvency & Bankruptcy Services – NCLT Representation in Ahmedabad and Across India

Overview

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms, and individuals in a time-bound manner. It replaces multiple earlier laws such as the Sick Industrial Companies Act and winding-up provisions under the Companies Act.
It also serves as a framework that foreign creditors can access for claims against Indian debtors, subject to procedural compliance.
For corporate entities — including companies and LLPs — the IBC provides a single forum and uniform process for insolvency resolution through the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), with appeals lying to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

The Code envisages two primary objectives:

  • Maximisation of value of assets of the debtor, and
  • Balancing the interests of all stakeholders, including creditors, employees, and shareholders.

Applicability and Forum

Process Snapshot

The corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the IBC typically involves:

Timelines

Assignment Completed
0 +
Satisfied Clients
0 +

Legal Framework & Key Provisions

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 operates as a complete code in itself for corporate insolvency and liquidation, with the following key features that influence how matters are planned and conducted:

Initiation of Proceedings

Moratorium (Section 14)

Role of Insolvency Professionals

Committee of Creditors (CoC)

Resolution Plan & Liquidation

Special Provisions

Cross-Border Elements

Key Services

For Operational Creditors (Section 9 IBC)

For Financial Creditors (Section 7 IBC)

For Corporate Debtors (Respondents in Section 7 or Section 9 Petitions)

Common grounds include:

For Corporate Debtors (Respondents in Section 7 or Section 9 Petitions)

For Resolution Applicants

Committee of Creditors (CoC) Interactions

Legal Nuances and Special Considerations in Insolvency Matters

4.1 Environmental Clearances and Labour/Employee Claims

Environmental clearances can become critical in insolvency proceedings, particularly for resolution applicants seeking to revive operations in sectors such as manufacturing, infrastructure, or mining. A project lacking valid environmental permissions may face operational delays, cost escalations, or outright regulatory stoppages — factors that can materially affect the viability of a resolution plan.

Labour and employee claims hold a unique position under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Such claims rank high in the waterfall mechanism for distribution under Section 53 in liquidation and must be addressed within any resolution plan approved under Section 30. For a resolution applicant, this means factoring wage arrears, retrenchment benefits, or provident fund dues into the plan’s financial structure. For employees, unions, or workmen representatives, it means ensuring that their admitted claims are recognised and prioritised in accordance with the Code. Our role may involve advising either category, depending on the engagement, ensuring compliance with statutory priorities and avoiding post-approval disputes.

Preservation and Treatment of Intellectual Property (IP)

Intellectual property, such as trademarks, patents, and proprietary technology, often forms a substantial portion of a distressed company’s value. Under CIRP, the resolution professional (RP) is tasked with preserving the company as a “going concern” under Section 20 of the Code. This includes ensuring that IP registrations are maintained, renewal fees are paid, and enforcement actions for infringement continue where necessary. For resolution applicants, this may involve incorporating IP protection strategies into the resolution plan to maintain competitive advantage post-acquisition.

In liquidation, IP may be sold as part of the asset pool under Regulation 32 of the Liquidation Process Regulations, provided it is transferable and not inextricably tied to personal skill or restricted by contract. Buyers of such IP may include industry competitors or investors looking for technology-driven assets. We advise stakeholders — whether RP, RA, or purchaser — on the legal, contractual, and regulatory considerations involved in such transactions.

Foreign Creditors and Cross-Border Insolvency Considerations

While India has yet to adopt a comprehensive cross-border insolvency framework (such as the UNCITRAL Model Law), the IBC does permit foreign creditors — financial or operational — to initiate proceedings against Indian corporate debtors, provided their claims are supported by the documentary evidence prescribed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. Such documents may include invoices, contracts, or other proof of default; they need not necessarily be based on a court decree or arbitral award.

However, where a foreign creditor seeks to rely on a decree from a non-reciprocating territory (as defined under Section 44A of the CPC), that decree cannot be executed directly in India. It can only form the basis of a fresh suit, which may not be efficient in the insolvency context. In such cases, unless the underlying contract or payment default can be evidenced through documents meeting IBC Rule requirements, the creditor may face limitations in directly filing under Sections 7 or 9.

Foreign creditors must also comply with procedural requirements, such as providing a local address for service and, where necessary, executing powers of attorney or authorisations in accordance with Indian law. This is an area where close coordination between international counsel and Indian insolvency lawyers is critical.

Industries and Transactions Covered

Insolvency and restructuring matters under the IBC cut across sectors, and each industry presents its own legal and commercial challenges. The following illustrations reflect scenarios where CIRP or liquidation may interact with sector-specific regulations or contractual frameworks. Where legal positions are not entirely settled, it is indicated accordingly.

Manufacturing and Supply Contracts

Where the corporate debtor has pending supply obligations—especially under government or strategic procurement contracts—the Resolution Professional (RP) may, during CIRP, seek interim directions from the NCLT to preserve the contract and prevent termination due to insolvency. Ultimately, the Resolution Applicant (RA) may include continuation or assignment of such contracts as a relief sought in the resolution plan. Unlike certain statutory licences, such contracts may be continued if NCLT deems it essential for value maximisation.

Infrastructure and Highway Development

For highway or large infrastructure projects, continuity of concession agreements and maintenance obligations is critical. Interim applications are typically moved by the RP to maintain project viability; final reliefs for continuation or restructuring of such agreements are addressed by the RA in the resolution plan. The law is still evolving on the scope of NCLT’s powers to grant such reliefs vis-à-vis government or statutory contracts.

Environmental Clearances and Regulatory Licences

Regulatory approvals—environmental, pollution control, mining licences—often cannot be unilaterally extended or revived by NCLT orders. The RP may maintain compliance and apply for renewals during CIRP, but long-term continuity will generally depend on whether the RA satisfies regulatory criteria. In some instances, NCLT has granted interim protection; however, the scope of such jurisdiction remains debatable.

Financial Service Providers (FSPs)

Under current IBC provisions, corporate insolvency proceedings against notified FSPs are subject to a special framework prescribed by the Central Government. This does not restrict FSPs themselves—such as NBFCs or housing finance companies—from initiating proceedings as creditors under section 7 of the IBC. However, proceedings against FSPs require adherence to the specific FSP Rules.

Intellectual Property (IP) in CIRP

IP assets—patents, trademarks, copyrights—can be preserved during CIRP and transferred under the resolution plan. The RP may take interim measures to safeguard IP from lapse (such as renewing registrations), while the RA may propose acquisition, licensing, or monetisation strategies. In liquidation, IP can be sold as part of the asset sale process if it is transferable under applicable IP law.

Public-Private Partnership (PPP) and Concession Projects

For PPP models—such as metro rail, port development, or special economic zones—continuation of concession agreements often requires consent from the public authority. The RP may seek interim relief to maintain project status quo, and the RA may seek such continuation as part of the final plan. While NCLT has in some cases granted interim protection, its authority to compel a public authority to continue a concession post-resolution remains open to legal debate.

Cross-Border Creditors and International Aspects

Foreign creditors can initiate insolvency proceedings in India if they meet the definition of “financial” or “operational” creditor under the IBC and hold evidence of debt in the prescribed form (such as contracts, invoices, or awards). A foreign decree from a non-reciprocating territory under the CPC is not directly enforceable in India; it can only serve as a cause of action for a fresh suit and does not by itself satisfy the IBC’s evidentiary requirements. In such cases, the creditor would need alternative documentary proof as specified under the IBC and its rules. Cross-border insolvency recognition in India is still at a developing stage, as the UNCITRAL Model Law has not yet been formally adopted

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Yes. Under section 12A of the IBC, a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) can be withdrawn post-admission with the approval of 90% of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). A pre-admission withdrawal does not require CoC approval. We have handled such withdrawals in practice, ensuring procedural compliance and minimising disruption to ongoing operations.
Yes, provided you meet the statutory definition of “financial creditor” or “operational creditor” under the IBC and possess admissible proof of debt (contracts, invoices, arbitral awards, or other prescribed documents). A foreign court decree from a non-reciprocating territory is not directly enforceable in India; it can serve only as a basis for a fresh suit and not as standalone proof for an IBC filing. In such cases, you will need alternative documentary evidence as per IBC rules.
In some cases, yes. The Resolution Professional (RP) may seek interim protection from NCLT to prevent termination of such contracts during CIRP, and the Resolution Applicant (RA) can request continuation in the resolution plan. While NCLT has occasionally granted such relief, the extent of its powers in this regard is still a matter of legal debate, especially for contracts involving public authorities.
Employee and workmen claims receive special priority under the IBC waterfall provisions. In CIRP, they form part of the admitted claims and can influence plan viability. In liquidation, they rank high in distribution priority, second only to secured creditors. This ensures that statutory dues to employees are not overlooked in the resolution or liquidation process.
IP can be preserved, renewed, or monetised during CIRP. The RP may take steps to prevent loss of IP rights, while the RA may propose to acquire or license the IP as part of the resolution plan. In liquidation, IP may be sold as part of the company’s assets if it is transferable under applicable IP law.
Yes. While India has not yet fully adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, we assist both Indian and international clients in dealing with foreign creditors, recognition of foreign proceedings (where possible), and enforcement of arbitral awards in insolvency contexts. For a deeper dive, see our related articles at R&D Law Chambers – Law Guide & Articles.
Our fees depend on the complexity, urgency, and jurisdictional scope of the matter. For preliminary case assessments, we may offer a fixed-fee structure. Comprehensive representation before NCLT, NCLAT, or in cross-border contexts is billed on an hourly or milestone basis. For more details, please refer to our Services Page or contact us directly for a tailored proposal.